Evaluation: Anger, Aggression, and Boundaries in Play Therapy

I Content/Relevancy/Teaching Methods:

Content was appropriate for intended audience.

Content was consistent with stated learning objectives.

Teaching methods were appropriate and effective for subject matter.

This program is appropriate to my education, experience, and skill level.

Issues of diversity were addressed.

The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information.

I would recommend this program to others.

I did not perceive any commercial bias or conflict of interest.

c) Content included recent studies/findings/literature on topic.

Information could contribute to achieving personal and professional goals.

II. Learning Objectives:

List three play therapy interventions for children presenting with anger/aggression

Discuss the benefits of aggressive energy through a Gestalt Play Therapy lens

Explain the importance of setting boundaries in play therapy

III. Presenter: Dr. Emily Keller

Knowledgeable in content areas

Presented the subject matter clearly and clarified content.

Responsive to participants and to their questions.

Maintained my interest.

Reviewed benefits, risks, and limitations of material presented. 

Provided a variety of applied examples. 

[Eval] The instructor related the accuracy of the material to empirical research.

IV. Overall Rating:

This session met or exceeded my expectations.

How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?

d) How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice and other professional development?

What do you perceive was the education level of this presentation?

Comments & Suggestions: